jump on my shoulders
let’s go to the seashore
it’s near us right now
can’t you feel it?
the knights between us have just fell down
we are freer than ever before
to explore more kingdoms
our heroes are alive again
they were swimming from the castles
so they are inside us now
waking us up
again and again
beats and resuscitation
all is mold
taken more and more slowly
Déjà vu is a strange feeling that we sometimes experience. Because this sensation/fact can be experienced by many people, and therefore for many times, it would be better to label déjà vu as a phenomenon. Nevertheless, to speak objectively about a phenomenon we must treat it phenomenologically (with the depth that this side of philosophy offers). The greatest mistake in treating/speaking about this issue is to make it more simple, to simplify it: when we do not know how to explain this phenomenon, we are used to appeal to the most common, known and simple explanation: reincarnation. But what if reincarnation –as an ultimate fact and reduced at extremes– is not rational. This means that you cannot say you have seen the same thing in another life as long as, perhaps, in a past life you were not a human. Moreover, that is impossible to remain the same, unchanged, as in the past life (or lives). Phenomenologically, the human being lives on multiple dimensions and he experiences more realities: for-itself (in/through consciousness – spirit) and in-itself (in/through the flesh – matter). We can know something through both reason (using our consciousness) and senses (using the physical body). When we do have a déjà vu, the information captured by the senses (e.g. sight) is lately delivered to consciousness, the true (authentic) existence – the essence. Next, when information arrives, delayed in a way, our brain has the feeling that it already experienced that thing. So, it really did do that thing but only in-itself, not for-itself (in consciousness). Thus, the present of consciousness is confused with the past of being-in-itself. To summarize, all of these represent just a way of how you can experience a déjà vu, and how it can be explained. Secondly, this phenomenon may come from the atemporal subconsciousness that reveals a further action to consciousness, either by dreams or something else (but only spiritually). Until that thing would happen to us we are not aware that the action has been revealed to us. Only in the moment when it is happening we do realize that we were prettified – that is also a déjà vu.
It is impossible for objectiveness (certain truth) to come out from subjectiveness or chaos (depends how you prefer to say). I am not talking about the impossibility of something to come out of nothing, but of objectiveness to randomly come out of chaos (chaos by its definition is relative). So, due to this nihilistic view, the only objective truth is that there is a chaos, randomly.
If you eliminate the possibility of an Objective Absolute-Being/Power (etc.) then all will split in a result with infinite possibilities, and also all will be relative and subjective.
As a free thinker you have to admit that you live in a world of infinite possibilities. Even as a radical sceptic, there is no doubt about that. Only a fool and narrow-minded person will refuse to believe it. à The irony is that the atheists nowadays, those who call themselves free thinkers and point out the fingers to religion as not being in this way, tend to be narrow-minded too – so certain about scientific knowledge. Consequently, it became more than a religion, and perhaps the most practiced/lived religion in the world. So they are more dogmatic and more religious in their beliefs of certainty and radical truths, more fundamentalist than more Christians, for instance.
Right now, more kingdoms make their appearance through my mind and start fighting. I am just that simple spectator, a cold observer who tries to understand what is truly happening and why – what are the real causes of these wars. Do they fight for a princess or just an illusion, perhaps the illusion of it? Do they want to rescue something – her or their own lives? What’s the scope of my sad and awkward moments? Are the battles within me useful for something or they just need to be ignored, going further? Why war and not peace – why fighting for love? Following it, will it be more desirable and pleasant, or more deservable?! Isn’t it deceiving yourself… autosuggestion? And all in all, it is so hard to interpret the things inside me… Where is the knowledge, where is the right reason – why have you abandoned me (I love you!…)? Why all abandon me?!?!…
an old man writing
himself like being an unknown
super-hero crying his heart
out of a supermarket
as there are too many cases
of being uncaused or especially deceived
hypnotised by his own unreal dreams
imposed by others in his cortex
like an opium for deep breathing
lying to himself about everything
denying that until dead
staying alive for a sin
is a deceit… just himself
you and I